This standings application is a preview using the new tiebreaker rules for 2026 with the 2025 standings. The new tiebreaker rules did not change any team order, but they did change the reason that the 0.500 teams were seeded the way they were. In the old rules head-to-head was ignored in a 3+ team tie if not every team had played each other. Going forward, if one team in the group has a better or worse record against all other teams in the group, that team will separate out as best or worst.
Tie-breaker rules were changed a second time for the 2026 season. We had the incorrect tiebreaker until 10am on Sunday May 17th. In our defense We set this up the first week of January and there were already a new to 2026 tiebreaker rule posted. The new change was a subsequent change (along with the new tournament format) sometime after that. Our apologies for the error.
22 wins / 8 losses (0.733)
RPI Rank: 20
tie broke by head-to-head
22 wins / 8 losses (0.733)
RPI Rank: 10
tie broke by head-to-head
21 wins / 9 losses (0.700)
RPI Rank: 80
18 wins / 12 losses (0.600)
RPI Rank: 39
17 wins / 13 losses (0.567)
RPI Rank: 78
16 wins / 14 losses (0.533)
RPI Rank: 68
tie broke by head-to-head
16 wins / 14 losses (0.533)
RPI Rank: 70
tie broke by head-to-head
15 wins / 15 losses (0.500)
RPI Rank: 85
tie broke by record vs. teams in positions 1-8
15 wins / 15 losses (0.500)
RPI Rank: 53
tie broke by record vs. teams in positions 1-8
15 wins / 15 losses (0.500)
RPI Rank: 86
worse record vs all in tied group
14 wins / 16 losses (0.467)
RPI Rank: 115
13 wins / 17 losses (0.433)
RPI Rank: 143
tie broke by head-to-head
Tournament Cut Line
13 wins / 17 losses (0.433)
RPI Rank: 131
tie broke by head-to-head
12 wins / 18 losses (0.400)
RPI Rank: 127
11 wins / 19 losses (0.367)
RPI Rank: 120
10 wins / 20 losses (0.333)
RPI Rank: 109
5 wins / 25 losses (0.167)
RPI Rank: 232